Legal Opinion

Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. 1997-2329Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 32.] DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED LTD. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; NORTH OLMSTED BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,

1998-Ohio-683.] Taxation–Real property valuation–Only one complaint as to valuation may be filed during an interim period–Exceptions–Improvements to real property–Rezoning is not an improvement to real property. (No. 97-2329—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.) APPEAL from the Board…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Park Ridge Co. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Columbia Toledo Corp. v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API