Horst Ex Rel. Horst v. Holtzen
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtThompsoN, J.
The case before us presents three questions for decision. Two of them are matters of the first impression in Iowa, and are difficult and important. In order that they may be understood the facts of record and the procedures had in the trial court must be stated. So far as they concern the first two points, the facts were stipulated.
On May 18, 1955, a group of ladies, residing in Sioux City, planned to attend a meeting of a church sewing circle in Jefferson, South Dakota. The defendant had agreed to furnish transportation for at least the first stage of the journey. Mrs. A. W. Horst, the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- West v. PoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Justice Ex Rel. Justice v. GatchellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Murray v. LangSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Nielsen v. KohlstedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Rainsbarger v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Chancey v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.