Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1923No. 3322PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the view which we take of this case, it is unnecessary for this court to determine whether the accusation to which the petitioner pleaded guilty, and on which plea he was sentenced, was sufficient, or that the acts therein set forth constituted a crime. Habeas corpus is not a substitute for a writ of error or other remedial procedure. Harrell v. Avera, 139 Ga. 340 (77 S. E. 160); Blackstone v. Nelson, 151 Ga. 706 (108 S. E. 114); Wells v. Pridgen, 154 Ga. 397 (114 S. E. 355). A sentence in a criminal case is evidence of its own legality. Wells v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Matter of GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Wells v. PridgenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Blackstone v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. Aldredge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Kinman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Harris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Shiflett v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API