Legal Opinion

Wells v. Pridgen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1922No. 3075PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Henson. City court of Douglas, January 23, 1922.

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

This was a proceeding by Prances Wells, the wife of Sweet Wells, against J. D. Pridgen, the warden of the chain-*398gang of Coffee County, for the writ of habeas corpus, to secure the discharge of Sweet Wells from the custody and restraint of said warden, on the ground that Wells was illegally restrained of his liberty; and for his restoration to his liberty. The petition for the writ of habeas corpus set up these facts: On or about March 15, 1919, Sweet Wells was arrested by the sheriff of Coffee County, and incarcerated in the jail of that county, without bail, under a charge of murder, and was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. In Re FrederichSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ernest Whippler v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., Warden, Georgia, State Prison, Reidsville, Tattnall County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Ex Rel. Preston Cobb, Jr. v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API