Legal Opinion
Parcell v. State of Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 20, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-2015PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This action is presently before the court for a decision on the merits of plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff Parcell seeks a permanent injunction against defendants to halt enforcement of various provisions of the Kansas Campaign Finance Act [KCFA]. K.S.A. 25-4101 to 4141. Parcell alleges this court has jurisdiction over the claims under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
The following facts underlie this litigation. Prior to the fall, 1978 primary election in Wyandotte County, plaintiff published and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dreyer v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Carlos S. Camacho, Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Women's Health Services, Inc. v. MaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- Richey v. TysonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.