Legal Opinion
Richey v. Tyson
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided November 13, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-0824-RVSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
VOLLMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ competing motions for summary judgment. (Docs.53, 57). The parties have submitted numerous briefs addressing their respective motions. (Docs.54, 58, 61-64, 66, 68, 75-76). 1 After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments as set forth in these filings and at oral argument, as well as all other relevant materials in the file, the Court concludes that both motions are due to be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This case requires the Court to explore the complex and…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. LeakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- California Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. GetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- California Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. GetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Independence Institute v. CoffmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. KelleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.