United States v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
The following questions of law have been certified by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to Article IV, Section 11(9), of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41:
I. Recovery for Increased Risk of Harm Viewed as a Present Change in Position
a. May a plaintiff who successfully asserts a claim pursuant to 18 Del.C. § 6853 recover, as an element of damages, for increased risk of harm stemming from the fact that defendant’s failure to diagnose, which constitutes a deviation from the standard of care, caused, to a reasonable…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Alberts v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Dambro v. MeyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.