Legal Opinion
Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, by certified question, asks us whether, in the circumstances presented, a professional employer organization (PEO) may be a proper claimant under a labor and materials surety bond.
Team Star Contractors, Inc. contracted with O’Ahlborg & Sons, Inc. to perform construction work at a site in Quincy, Massachusetts. In connection with the project, in March 1998 the Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc., as surety, issued two labor and material payment bonds to Team Star as principal and O’Ahlborg as obligee,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. The Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- AMS Const. Co., Inc. v. Warm Springs Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- People v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Sweet v. Fresno Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Feldman Law Group P.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Spano v. V & J National Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Matter of Gaylord v. Buffalo Transp., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Tradesmen International, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- In re RobsonWoese, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.