Sweet v. Fresno Hotel Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The cases here presented are actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens.
All the parties appealed. The appeal of the plaintiffs, Brandt Bros., was presented in case No. 6915 and has been decided, the judgment having been held good against their attacks. (Brandt Bros. v. Fresno Hotel Co., 173 Cal. 209, [159 Pac. 434].) The appeals of the other parties are presented by the record in this case (No. 7268), and will now be considered. The contract was made and filed and the work was begun prior to the enactment of the amendments of 1911 to the mechanic’s lien law. The rights of the respective parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Godeffroy v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- San Diego Lumber Co. v. WooldredgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. The Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Contractors Labor Pool, Inc. v. Westway Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Glassco v. El Sereno Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.