Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Anzai

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1997No. 20264PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) section 37D-9 (Supp.1996), Petitioner Earl I. Anzai, Director of Finance for the State of Hawai'i (Director), seeks an opinion regarding the following question:

Are financing agreements which meet the requirements’ of [1996 Hawai'i Session Laws] Act 119 (chapter 37D, Hawaii Revised Statutes), including a clause providing that payments are subject to appropriation and clauses providing that no hens or claims are created against the State and that no pledge of the full faith and credit of the State is made by the financing…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sato v. TawataHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Lonegan v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Fults v. City of CoralvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2008
  5. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API