Legal Opinion

In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1998No. 90101Published

1Opinion of the Court

958 P.2d 759 (1998)

1998 OK 25

In the Matter of the Application of the OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY for Approval of Not Exceeding $300 Million Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority State Highway Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1997, for the Construction, Improvement, Maintenance and Repair of All or Part of Certain Roads, Highways and Bridges by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation.

No. 90101.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 20, 1998.

Rehearings Denied April 30, 1998.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, Douglas F. Price, Assistance Attorney General, Gary M. Bush,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Simms; Concurrence · Hodges; Concurrence · Hargrave; Dissent · Lavender; Dissent · Opala; Dissent · Wilson; Dissent · Wilson; Dissent · Watt.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API