Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. Naugatuck

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 11, 2002No. AC 18902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendants1 in this declaratory judgment action appeal from the trial court’s rendering of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the board of education of the town and borough of Naugatuck (board of education), following the court’s determination that two recent amendments to the borough’s municipal charter were invalid. The defendants claim that the court’s rendering of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff was improper because (1) the charter amendment providing for separate referenda on the borough’s education budget and operating budget (budget…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Covenant Insurance v. CoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Town & Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Snyder v. SeldinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. McEnerney v. United States Surgical Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Board of Education v. Town & Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API