Legal Opinion
McEnerney v. United States Surgical Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 1, 2002No. AC 22437PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*612 Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Carol McEnemey, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the board improperly affirmed the commissioner’s determination that she is not entitled to benefits under General Statutes § 31-308a1 because she relocated to Florida and (2) the board improperly enforced the requirement in § 31-308a that she be willing and able to perform work in Connecticut because that requirement impermissibly restricts her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sellers v. Sellers Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- ARB Construction, LLC v. Pinney Construction Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Esposito v. Waldbaum's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003