Legal Opinion

Alumino-Thermic Corp. v. Goldschmidt Thermit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 20, 1928No. 3558PublishedCited by 612 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the use of alumino-thermie metal for welding. The workable method of commercially- producing, that .remarkable product was disclosed in patent. No. 578,868, granted March 16, 1897, to Hans Goldschmidt.

The present plaintiff became the owner of that patent, brought suit upon it, and its validity was sustained by this court in Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co., 292 F. 362, wherein will be found this court’s estimate of the remarkable invention which Dr. Goldschmidt made, and by reference as well to Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. American…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falk Mfg. Co. v. Missouri R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. American Vanadium Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
  3. Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923

3Cited by612 opinions

  1. (HC) Abraria v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (HC) Alford v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (HC) Ansley v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Arismendez v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Arismendez v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

607 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API