Legal Opinion

(HC) Abraria v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01161Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY RALPH ABRARIA, No. 2:21-cv-01161-TLN-KJN 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, et al., 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 09, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on petitioner and contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alumino-Thermic Corp. v. Goldschmidt Thermit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API