(HC) Arismendez v. Baughman
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ, 12 No. 2:17-cv-00792-MCE-CKD P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 ORDER DAVID BAUGHMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 13, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alumino-Thermic Corp. v. Goldschmidt Thermit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005