Legal Opinion

(HC) Alford v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 4, 2024No. 2:21-cv-02293Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COURTNEY RICARDO ALFORD, No. 2:21-cv-02293-TLN-AC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 PAUL THOMPSON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 6, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties, and contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alumino-Thermic Corp. v. Goldschmidt Thermit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API