State v. Valencia
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
T1 Defendant Steven Valencia appeals from his conviction for retail theft, a third degree felony. Valencia argues that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by refusing to appoint substitute counsel and by requiring him to proceed pro se. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
{2 Valencia was charged with retail theft, a violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-602 (1999). The charges arose from an incident at a jewelry store in Roy, Utah. Valencia and his wife were at the store dropping off a bracelet for repair. A store clerk noticed Valencia and his wife…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. James Earl Young, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WanosikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. VancleaveCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Mulder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. BozarthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.