Legal Opinion

State v. Bozarth

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 4, 2021No. 20190397-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2021 UT App 117

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. EDDIE RAY BOZARTH, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190397-CA Filed November 4, 2021 Fifth District Court, Beaver Department The Honorable Keith C. Barnes No. 171500096 Leah Jordana Aston, Attorney for Appellant Sean D. Reyes and Thomas Brunker, Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE DIANA HAGEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES JILL M. POHLMAN and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 The police responded to a report that parolee Eddie Ray Bozarth was acting erratically and might be using drugs. Bozarth’s parole officer (the parole…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. Provo City v. Bishop-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. State v. LuckeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API