Mulder v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge;,
¶1 Todd W. Mulder appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the State on his claims for postconviction relief. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In 2003, Mulder and an acquaintance from prison, Campbell, decided to rob the victim's (Victim) coin shop at the suggestion of Mulder’s girlfriend, Schlegel. Schlegel and Mulder had previously been to Victim’s shop, where Schlegel noticed that Victim had retrieved cash from a safe behind his counter and that he had left the safe unlocked afterward. Schlegel brought up the idea of robbing Victim’s coin shop,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Santiago Tapia v. Robert TansyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CrespoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. AllgoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Brierley v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Logue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
- Mulder v. NielsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.