Legal Opinion

Boyd v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 1, 1886No. 983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an information against thirty-five cases of polished plate glass. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court. Judgment in favor of the United States. The claimants sued out this writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court 1

116 U.S. 616 (1886)

BOYD

v.

UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 11, 14, 1885.

Decided February 1, 1886.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Mr. Edwin B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stephen G. Clarke was with him on the brief.

Mr. Solicitor-General for defendant in error.

2Opinion of the Court · BradleyJustice Bradley

This was an information filed by the District Attorney of the United States in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, in July, 1884, in a cause of seizure and forfeiture of property, against thirty-five cases of plate glass, seized by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. Three Tons of CoalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1875
  3. United States v. MasonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1875
  4. United States v. Distillery No. Twenty-EightDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1875
  5. In re PlattDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Howard CottermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API