Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Howard Cotterman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2013No. 09-10139Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*971CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part, dissenting in part, and concurring in the judgment, with whom CLIFTON, Circuit Judge, joins, and with whom M. SMITH, Circuit Judge, joins as to all but Part II.A:

Whether it is drugs, bombs, or child pornography, we charge our government with finding and excluding any and all illegal and unwanted articles and people before they cross our international borders. Accomplishing that Herculean task requires that the government be mostly free from the Fourth Amendment’s usual restraints on searches of people and their property. Today the majority ignores…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Flores-MontanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Serafin Alfonso, Humberto Rayo, Fabian Mora, Primo Antonio Serrano-TellezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Guzman-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. GibersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API