Legal Opinion
Marshall Lodge No. 39, A. F. A. M. v. Woodson
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The first question involved, as stated by plaintiff in error, is as follows:
“Under the law as it existed before the enactment of the 1933 Probate Act, could an executor, by paying interest on a debt within the time allowed for filing claim, and by otherwise recognizing the debt as a valid claim against the estate, waive the filing ol the debt as a claim against the estate ?”
This writ of error is addressed to a final judgment on demurrer in favor of the executors of the estate of Henry P. Woodson, deceased, who were defendants in the court below. The court sustained a demurrer to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Brooks v. Fed. Land Bk. of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Ellison v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1858
- Fillyau v. LavertySupreme Court of Florida · 1850
- Barnes v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fleeman v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Baker v. HappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
- Adams v. the Hackensack Trust CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- In Re Estate of ComstockSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Jackson v. Princeton Farms Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.