Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 9, 1932PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

William M. Brooks in August, 1918, became indebted to the Federal Land Bank of Columbia in the sum of Five Thousand Five Hundred Dollars. That indebtedness was evidenced by the promissory note of Brooks and his wife.

The note by its terms was made payable on an amortization plan in thirty-four annual installments' of Three Hundred and Fifty-seven Dollars and Fifty cents each, the first installment payable July 1, 1920, the subsequent installments were payable at the same time in each succeeding year until the principal should be paid. Any installment in which there was a default should bear…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. CroslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Cone v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Morgan v. HamletSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. First Trust & Savings Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. In Re Agee's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McCord v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Estate of Randall v. Colorado State HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Victor Chemical Works v. GaySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Denver Water Department Credit Union v. Estate of OngaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. In Re Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API