Legal Opinion

Fleeman v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terrell, C. J. —

The City of Jacksonville filed its petition in the Circuit Court to validate an issue of refunding bonds to take the place of or redeem outstanding bonds maturing January 1, January 15, and February 15, 1940. A rule to show cause and notice to citizens and taxpayers was duly promulgated. Proof of publication was shown and the State attorney on behalf of the State answered the rule to show cause. Appellant was also permitted to intervene and answer the rule to show cause. A motion to strike portions of the intervenor’s answer was granted, a final decree validating the refunding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boatright v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. City of Miami v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Marshall Lodge No. 39, A. F. A. M. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. St. Charles County v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. City of Albuquerque v. GottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. the City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API