Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Scott

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ of Error to tbe Circuit Court for Jackson county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Tayloe, J. :

When this cause was first brought to this court upon writ of error, William D. Barnes and Rhoda E. King, as surviving executors of Cullen Curl, deceased, were the plaintiffs in error, and Alice G-. King was the defendant in error; since that time it has been made to appear that both Rhoda E. King and Alice G. King have died, and that Andrew Scott, sheriff of Jackson county, has qualified- ex officio as administrator of said Alice Gf. King, deceased; and, by consent of all parties, the said Scott as administrator, takes the place of *288said Alice 0. King as a party to the suit here,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones, Varnum & Co. v. Townsend's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Judy v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Deans v. WilcoxonSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Garrett v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. McHardy v. Surviving of McHardySupreme Court of Florida · 1857

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Raines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  4. Sammis v. JamesSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API