Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. 62). Plaintiffs move to compel responses by Defendant Dorel Industries, Inc. (“DI”) to Plaintiffs’ First Requests for Production No. 57-71. In addition, Plaintiffs seek to recover the fees and expenses they have incurred in connection with the filing of this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion to Compel. The Court will also grant Plaintiffs’ request for an award of fees and expenses.
I. Background Information
This is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Swackhammer v. Sprint Corp. PCSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.