Legal Opinion

Sigel v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeals, Nos. 11 and 12PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Plaintiffs sued defendant upon its residence and outside theft insurance policy. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and the court below awarded a new trial, concluding that the charge may have misled the jury. Defendant appealed.

The policy insured plaintiffs against theft of certain personal property, including jewelry, and provided inter alia: “The word Theft’ includes larceny, burglary and robbery. Mysterious disappearance of any insured property, except a precious or semiprecious stone from its setting in any watch or piece of jewelry, shall be presumed to be due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Davis v. St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammontree v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Ruby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America, New York County Courts1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API