Sigel v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Plaintiffs sued defendant upon its residence and outside theft insurance policy. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and the court below awarded a new trial, concluding that the charge may have misled the jury. Defendant appealed.
The policy insured plaintiffs against theft of certain personal property, including jewelry, and provided inter alia: “The word Theft’ includes larceny, burglary and robbery. Mysterious disappearance of any insured property, except a precious or semiprecious stone from its setting in any watch or piece of jewelry, shall be presumed to be due…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Davis v. St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hammontree v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Ruby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America, New York County Courts1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.