Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Chuck v. Alves

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1954No. Civ. 15701PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

This action involves a dispute over water rights. Judgment was for defendants, the respondents here.

Appellants are riparian land owners along Stevens Creek in Santa Clara County. This stream rises in the Santa Cruz Mountains and flows in a general northerly direction across Santa Clara Valley and empties into San Francisco Bay.

Bespondents divert water from Stevens Creek at a point above the holdings of appellants and carry the water so diverted through a pipeline for a distance of over two miles to irrigate their own and other lands lying along the pipeline. Their water…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tobola v. WholetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Butticci v. Schindel Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Leonardini v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API