Legal Opinion
Butticci v. Schindel Furniture Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1957No. Civ. 17302; Civ. 17303PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
As a result of injuries received in an intersection accident between two automobiles, John Butticci, the driver of one car, and Emilo Butticci, his son, brought separate actions for damages against Henry Schindel, the driver of the other car. Schindel cross-complained against John Butticci. The actions were consolidated for trial. The jury brought in verdicts for all of the defendants. From the judgments entered on these verdicts John and Emilo Butticci appeal, contending that the evidence does not support the verdicts, and that the verdicts are fatally inconsistent.
The scene of the accident…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tossman v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Brokaw v. Black-Foxe Military InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheppard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Stafford v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Mertes v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Beard v. DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960