Legal Opinion
Etna Forge & Bolt Co. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 11, 1922No. 2810PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit by defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, to recover the balance of the purchase price of 400 tons of steel bars at “$3.50 per cwt., delivered.” Judgment was entered against the defendant for the full amount claimed to be due for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The defendant *787sued out a writ of error to this court on the ground that the judge of the District Court erred in entering the judgment.
The contract, dated August 30, 1920, provided that plaintiff was to ship 400 tons of steel bars at $3.50 per hundredweight “at mill’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- City of Newark v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Page Steel & Wire Co. v. Blair Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.