Legal Opinion
City of Newark v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 8, 1929No. 3992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The City of Newark agreed for a consideration to furnish William M. Mills and Andrew H. Mills storage space at Port Newark for their fleet of steam excursion boats during the winter of 1926-27. Eight boats were brought in and tied np at the dock as agreed upon. One night the Steamer “South Shore” suddenly began to fill and the next morning she sank without any known reason, blocking the head of the channel and .preventing the use of the dock by other craft. The City called upon the Mills brothers to raise and move the boat. They refused and formally abandoned her. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Eastern Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- In Re Petition of Boat Demand, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
- In Re the Complaint of Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1968
- Lathrop v. Rice & Adams CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.