Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Diamond

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2012No. Docket 32,695PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{1} This appeal presents this Court with a matter of first impression: does the New Mexico Emancipation of Minors Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 32A-21-1 to -7 (1995) (the Act), which provides that a minor may be emancipated for “one or more purposes” set forth in the Act, see Section 32A-21-7(D), authorize a district court to declare a minor emancipated for some rather than all of those enumerated purposes? Based on the plain language and legislative purpose of the Act, we answer that question in the affirmative and accordingly reverse the Court of Appeals.

I. BACKGROUND

{2} Petitioner Jhette…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dewitt v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. AlmanzarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Starko. Inc. v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep'tNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cordova v. ClineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Oppenheimer & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API