Legal Opinion
State v. Oppenheimer & Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2019No. A-1-CA-35912PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Qui tam plaintiffs Frank Foy and John Casey (Qui Tam Plaintiffs) appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint (Complaint) brought pursuant to the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (FATA), NMSA 1978, §§ 44-9-1 to - 14 (2007, as amended through 2015). Qui Tam Plaintiffs contend that the district court erred in granting the State of New Mexico and County of Bernalillo's joint motion to dismiss the Complaint. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} In August 2015 Qui Tam Plaintiffs filed a qui tam action1 under Section 44-9-5 of FATA against former Bernalillo County…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- United Rentals Northwest, Inc. v. Yearout Mechanical, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JADE G.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hall v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. CabralNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Southwest Org. Project v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo Cnty. Air Quality Control Bd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- State Ex Rel. Foy v. Vanderbilt Capital AdvisorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. DiricksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.