Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover upon a promissory note in the principal sum of $500, together with interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. The complaint is in the usual form. Defendants answered. In their answer they allege that the note was without consideration, that it was given as the initial payment on a contract for the purchase of real property, and that such contract was canceled and terminated by the plaintiff prior to the time it commenced the action to recover on the note. The action was originally commenced in the city court of Ogden City, Utah. The trial resulted in a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stinson v. SneedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Warren v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Dopp v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Croup v. Humboldt Quartz & Placer Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Commercial Real Estate Investment, L.C. v. Comcast of Utah II, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Miller v. RemiorIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.