Legal Opinion

White v. Keilty

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 7, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The defendant, as surety, became bound in the sum of $1000 in a recognizance to the plaintiff on condition that Eugene W. Keilty, the principal, would appear before the next term of the Court of Common Pleas for the judicial district of Waterbury, to be held on the first Tuesday of September, 1938, then and there to answer the charges contained in a bastardy complaint brought by the plaintiff against the principal in the recognizance “and abide the decision of the court thereon.” The accused appeared at the trial. The court reserved its decision. Thereafter judgment in the bastardy action was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brill v. BrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Baurer v. DevenisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Rutkowski v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
  5. Town of Naugatuck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. ApuzzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Singleton v. TrautmanConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  3. Singleton v. TrautmanPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1954
  4. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
  5. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API