Legal Opinion

People v. Summers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 2009No. 08SA169PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

This original proceeding arises out of the defendant's motion to dismiss the sexual assault on a child charges against him because they are time barred. The defendant contends that the ten-year statute of limitations in effect when he allegedly committed the crimes mandates dismissal of charges brought more than ten years after the last alleged incident. The People counter that the General Assembly's amendment of the statute of limitations for sexual assault on a child, extending it to ten years after the victim reaches the age of eighteen, was intended to apply retroactively and therefore…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. SimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. ClendeninColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  5. Meyerstein v. City of AspenColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API