Legal Opinion
Korst v. McMahon
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 12, 2006No. 32684-1-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
148 P.3d 1081 (2006)
Carolyn E. KORST and Steven G. Korst, wife and husband, Appellants,
v.
Phillip R. McMAHON, Sr. and Mona D. McMahon, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 32684-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
December 12, 2006.
Stephen D. Cramer, Attorney at Law, Federal Way, WA, for Appellants.
Phillip R. Sr. McMahon (Appearing Pro Se), Mona D. McMahon (Appearing Pro Se).
BRIDGEWATER, P.J.
¶ 1 Carolyn Korst appeals from a bench trial that dismissed her claims against her father for childhood sexual abuse on statute of limitations grounds. We reverse and remand the matter for trial.
¶…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Scott's Excavating Vancouver, LLC v. Winlock Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Jensen v. Lake Jane EstatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.