Legal Opinion

C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. Nos. 66252-5; 66580-0; 65654-1PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

— In these consolidated cases we are asked to determine the scope of RCW 4.16.340, the statute of limitations applicable to civil claims “based on” intentional childhood sexual abuse. Specifically, we must decide whether negligence claims brought against church entities and individual church officials who did not themselves directly perpetrate intentional acts of childhood sexual abuse, but *705who allegedly failed to protect the child victims or otherwise prevent the abuse, fall within the broad limitations period allowed under the statute.

We answer in the affirmative.1 Each case also raises…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Monica L. McDowell Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church Will AcklesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API