Legal Opinion
Bobby v. Mitts
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 2, 2011No. 10-1000PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
An Ohio jury convicted respondent Harry Mitts on two counts of aggravated murder and two counts of attempted murder. He was sentenced to death. At issue here is part of the jury instructions given during the penalty phase of Mitts’s trial. The instructions, in pertinent part, were as follows:
“[Y]ou must determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether the aggravating circumstances, which [Mitts] was found guilty of committing in the separate counts, are sufficient to outweigh the mitigating factors you find are present in this case.
“When all 12 members of the jury find by proof beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Jeffrey Wogenstahl v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lee Moore v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.