Legal Opinion

Lee Moore v. Betty Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2013No. 08-3167, 08-3230PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Circuit Judge.

This habeas ease arises from Lee Moore’s conviction in Ohio state court of aggravated murder, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping. In cross-appeals, Warden Betty Mitchell appeals the district court order conditionally granting Lee Moore’s petition based on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing and improper jury instructions. Lee Moore appeals the denial of several other claims for relief. For the following reasons we REVERSE the district court’s grant of habe-as relief with respect to Moore’s claims of ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited124 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. Antonio Franklin v. Charlotte JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Dennis McGuire v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Inst.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Kwame KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Genesis Hill v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API