Legal Opinion

United States v. 100 Acres of Land

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1972No. Nos. 26483, 26531PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRED M. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is a condemnation action involving a small peninsula of sandy real estate on the coast of Marin County, California, commonly known as Limantour Spit, some 45 miles north of the city of San Francisco on the Pacific Coast. Appellee (Drake’s Beach) claims title through a patent of the United States to Andrew Randall issued June 4, 1860. *1263The Government contends that the land in question was not included in the patent. These proceedings had their inception when the United States purchased from Drake’s Beach some 850 acres adjacent to this parcel of land for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. United States v. 429.59 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Louis Schneider v. County of San Diego, and Reybro, Inc., a California Corporation, Dba, Quality Auto RecyclingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. 99.66 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. 33.5 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API