State v. Clark

ARNOLD, Judge.

We see no merit in defendant’s argument that the court erred in failing to hold a voir dire on the pretrial photographic identification of defendant by the prosecutrix.

*587Testimony objected to was by Deputy Whitt who testified that some six months after the offense he showed Mrs. Kincy six black and white photographs and asked her to select her assailant if his photograph were present. She immediately picked out defendant’s photograph. The six pictures were exhibited to the jury for their inspection.

There is no evidence that the photographic identification was impermissibly…