Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1978No. 7726SC634Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Error is assigned to the trial court’s allowing the State to cross-examine defendant about previous convictions. It is asserted that the North Carolina law allowing the State to cross-examine a defendant concerning prior criminal convictions should be reconsidered. Our Supreme Court has refused to change the rule as it is hereinafter stated, and this Court will not reconsider the rule as stated in State v. McKenna, 289 N.C. 668, 224 S.E. 2d 537, vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom McKenna v. North Carolina, --- U.S. --- , 50 L.Ed. 2d 278, 97 S.Ct. 301 (1976); State v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. PooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API