State v. Knight
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Appellant’s first assignment of error is based on his contention that the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive that admission of the in-court identification violated due process of law. This contention questions the admissibility of testimony concerning the photographic identification at the hospital as well as the admissibility of Mr. Garner’s in-court identification of defendant himself.
In Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 19 L.Ed. 2d 1247, 88 S.Ct. 967 (1968), the Court refused to prohibit absolutely the use of identification by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.