Legal Opinion

McKown v. Demmler Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1965No. Appeals, 163 and 164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Thomas A. McKown, Jr., the plaintiff in this case, was injured when he walked into a building at 100 Ross Street in Pittsburgh, owned by Demmler Properties, Inc., the defendant, and fell. He brought suit in trespass against Demmler * and recovered a verdict of $15,000. He moved for a new trial on the basis that the verdict was inadequate. The defendant moved for judgment n.o.v. The trial court ordered a new trial and refused judgment n.o.v. The defendant appealed.

The plaintiff McKown was a painting estimator employed by a Neiser Company which had done some work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Alexander Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Slobodzian v. BeighleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Matthews v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Falen Et Ux. v. Monessen Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Crotty v. Eeading Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. McNally v. LiebowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. HARMAN ON BEHALF OF HARMAN v. BorahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API