Legal Opinion

Crotty v. Eeading Industries, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 469PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The appellant, Edward Crotty, was injured in an industrial accident while working as an independent contractor on /the premises of the appellee, Reading Industries, Inc.' [hereinafter Reading]. The appellant filed an action in trespass against Reading contending that the negligence or its agent or employee in starting an industrial machine on which the appellant was working, without first ascertaining that the machine could be started safely, was the proximate cause of appellant’s injuries.1 Upon trial of the cause a jury returned a verdict in favor of Reading Industries…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Younce v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Peter Smith v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., T/d/b/a Seven Springs Ski ResortCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Palange v. Philadelphia Law Dept.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Wood v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Emge v. HagoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API