Legal Opinion

Falen Et Ux. v. Monessen Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1949No. Appeals, 225 and 226PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

These appeals are by the defendant from respective judgments for the plaintiffs, a husband and wife, for damages for personal injuries to the wife allegedly caused by negligence of the defendant. The appellant charges error in the lower court’s refusal of the defendant’s motions for judgments n. o. v. It is the appellant’s contention that the wife plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Viewing the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the verdict, as a motion for judgment n. o. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Bartek v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Conboy v. Osage Tribe No. 113Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Barth Et Vir v. KlinckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Parking, Inc. v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. McNally v. LiebowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. McKown v. Demmler Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API