Legal Opinion
United States v. Baran
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided November 1, 1984No. ACM 24340PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CARPARELLI, Judge:
The appellant has been convicted of rape.1 2Appellate defense counsel argue, *450inter alia, that two admissions made by appellant were accepted in evidence without sufficient corroboration and that testimony regarding hearsay statements made by one of appellant’s co-actors was admitted contrary to the rules of evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. Having considered all the errors asserted, we affirm. The facts before us are as follows.
The victim, Airman K.P., testified that she became extremely intoxicated in appellant’s barracks room while…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. BaranUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. WagnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. PoduszczakU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. LonetreeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.