Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. Better Business Bureau

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Appealability of order. By statute, an order which grants, refuses, modifies, or dissolves an injunction is appealable.1 In Nash v. Meggett 2 this court held that a particular restraining order was not appealable because it was not final, as required of orders made appealable by present sec. 274.33 (2), Stats. Finality of the order is not a requirement, however, of sec. 274.33 (3), and this holding of Nash v. Meggett, supra, is overruled. On many occasions this court has considered appeals from orders refusing or dissolving temporary injunctions.3 The order here involved is appealable.

*1032.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bartell Broadcasters, Inc. v. Milwaukee Broadcasting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gunnison v. HoehneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Nash v. MeggettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Scheer v. WeisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sensenbrenner v. KepplerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Urquhart CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API